« Office 2.0 threatens Microsoft Not! | Main | Vox for the private, personal, and playful »
… I’m sure I’m repeating myself and plenty of others by now, but it’s time to resurface “the vision” of Information Flow. It’s easy with long days and a real and full life with varied encounters with strangers, friends, and family to fall back on the crutch of calling what I do, “Beyond Search stuff.” But here in my open conversations with you it’s time to remint the concept, especially in the fresh dirt as the sprout of a new company labors to push its head out.
Beyond Search is not the same thing as Search getting better. Search can get better. Boy, can it?! However, Beyond Search is something else. Not just the litany of algorithms and technologies i.e. linguistics, statistics, extraction, categorization, clustering, personalization, visualization, social this that and the other. There is a holistically different experience to be had! And it will be at least as valuable as Search to some people, and that some is a huge many. It’s everybody that has a long term stake in subject matters and that utilizes such knowledge to get things done in the world. It’s poets, priests and politicians; it’s lawyers, doctors, and professors; journalist, analysts, and researchers; and it’s business professionals, financiers, and even thoroughbred horse rearers.
At PARC as we saw a future shift from document creation to information access coming, we, speaking Academicese called it Intelligent Information Access. And at Inxight, in Marketingese, we called it Discovery. And in the idiolect (and that doesn’t mean a language spoken by an idiot) of Ramanese, it’s the difference between “Users Chasing Documents,” and Information Flow enabled by “Statistics over Statements.” How we utilize information available over the Internet in professional activities is still fundamentally challenged. I think everybody can tell their own version of the story.
In throwaway lines, I’ve said to many, “you could called our new venture, a Vertical Search play, but it ain’t vertical, and it ain’t search.” That line is a disservice in its aint-i-ness, because things worth doing should be expressed in the positive (hmm, maybe). Now, the drum roll … we are building a REAP system (now you got it, huh?), but REAP is much bigger than us, much, and so I’m going to start talking about the bigger.
Beyond Search is REAP. REAP acro-expands into Retrieve, Extract, Arrange, Present. And REAP systems help people support that full process using those technologies mentioned above. Certainly, any of these verbs can be picked on, and many alternatives like Collect, Analyze, Organize, Keep, Share, hey even Remix, so fly to mind. But in aggregate, the point without niggling, is that we’re still not there with the deeper tools and the whole experience we desire for truly reaping the value from all that’s available to us on the Internet. Consider the typical information work flow of a professional:
Search is just about the retrieve and the -eaping is pretty much left to the person. Does knowledge worker come to mind? My all time favorite word for the human process (hat tip of fifteen years back to friends Dan Russell and Mark Stefik) is sensemaking because it reaches to even the deepest levels and the broadest extent of what we are after. Some of my friends, especially these two—actually pretty much all of my friends and yours too—are incredible sensemaking machines.
We all use the aggregate of tools and means at our disposal to make sense of subjects and the world and to guide our actions. However, I’m sensing a widespread frustration with a great deal of wasteful manual labor as we die, gently reaping. And though I am a huge believer that doing things by hand often gives you a depth of understanding, there’s a lot I don’t do because of the effort required. The difference between productivity and new capability isn’t always in kind, but often in degree. If you can take many more steps, you arrive at places you’d never get. And I’ll continue to invest my time on the bet that huge social opportunity lies ahead in making us all smarter by mainstreaming REAP systems.
Speak up, come along …
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.ramanarao.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/57
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Beyond Search is REAP:
» reap from manuel
This will be BIG, and I hereby reserve my I told you so rights: Retrieve — collect information from a variety of sources Extract — extract data, facts, examples Arrange — arrange documents and facts for use now or later [Read More]
Comments
Maybe it’s more than search, but search is the most generic part. What makes it hard to create sensemaking tools of broad interest is that different tasks need different external representations.
Looking at the leverage points. Our broad cognitive task analysis of tasks for intelligence analysts (and others) resulted in another REAP-like model with two (“count ‘em”) major loops:
(1) an information foraging loop (the retrieve part; maybe also extract) and (2) a Re-representation loop (That’s the arrange & present part of REAP).
At this 30,000 foot level of description, a lot of sensemaking tasks look the same. But where the information hits the display, they look different — BECAUSE the fundamental representation requirements for different tasks are different enough.
This is not to say that there cannot be a broad success here. It was intriguing to me that in my experience on looking at prototype systems built for the intelligence community that over time these systems began to look (at least superficially) more and more alike as designers tried to capture the things that worked.
As you start getting realistic examples of tasks, the high-value points jump out at you. You look where sensemaking systems can do things automatically (specialized kinds of extraction, combinatorial or large-scale information boosting); you look for the kinds performance challenges lie (situation awareness, information fusion) and the boosted insights need to arise (visualization). I think that by the time you optimize those features — you have a system that has become highly specialized.
This question arises for me: is there a design for a good-enough sensemaking system for broad use? Maybe, maybe.
Posted by: Mark Stefik | November 3, 2006 9:32 AM
I think it is about time to re-visit some of the old ideas and see how they fit in the new order. Today search works 24x7 for retrieving purposes only, which is extremely valuable don’t get me wrong. But at the same time, you start to put a certain amount of manual labor. Like reverse engineer keywords so you can see hit something that extract a meaningful snippet and arrange the item in the top-10 list. Can we do better? I’m sure we can and I’m glad that you are heading into that direction. I would love to see your REAP system.
Posted by: Omar Alonso | November 4, 2006 9:23 AM
Hi Ramana, I think beyond search is semantics. A map of the world out there.
Posted by: Michael Meier-Schulz | November 7, 2006 2:06 PM
Mark, I’ve posted some thoughts about what a sensemaking system for broad use could look like at:
http://manuel.typepad.com/manuel/2006/11/sensemaking_fur.html
Posted by: Manuel Simoni | November 18, 2006 2:40 AM