MastHead Ramana Rao's Home Page Ramana Rao's Blog Ramana Rao's Trails Ramana Rao's Sensemaking
LINK TRAILS
Feel free to track links I share using delicious. I use a few particular tags to provide focused trails.
Related to main topic of Information Flow
Reading that I find interesting enough to point out to others
IRREGULARS
By accident, I landed in a group, called the Enterprise Irregulars, of astute observers of information technology. The group includes former and current investors, analysts, journalists, entrepreneurs, mostly also bloggers now.
Irregulars Badge
NEWSLETTER
I may restart my opt-in email newsletter, so consider subscribing.
Subscribe Button

« Blog Technologists Working Together | Main | R.R. Falls »

July 25, 2003

Googleholes

Categories: Search

Steven Johnson's Slate article on some weaknesses in Google created lots of noise in the discussion area. He explains his intentions on his blog.

The three so-called google holes are pretty well understood among people that really understand Internet Search, but not so by most Internet users. Most people do tend to carry many misconceptions including: 1) there is a right answer to a search 2) google is better than other search engines by a long shot at coming up with the right answer and 3) searching a universe of everything makes sense. Though the three google holes that SBJ is pointing at don't exactly correspond to these three points, along with the blog comments SBJ's holes cover these points and more.

Over time people are getting more sophisticated about the limitations of Internet Search engines as they get more road miles behind them. And thus will start to entertain solutions that involve a bit more knowledge on their part. I've been saying for a long time that users won't do more than one word queries, but it's coming time to pull the other way. Somewhere between one word queries and a bard's 14 line depiction of injury at the hands of a lover is the possibility of some elaboration by the user.

Similarly, we can start to expect more from the systems. Why should it deliver back the myth of a uniform list of results from a universe of equivalent things? Especially when it "knows" that it has lots of different kinds of things (not just several kinds of apple, but also many different formats and genres and kinds and ages and orientations of sources and documents). And that even if the most likely thing users want is one thing, that in fact most users will want one of many other things. Why not present this structure and diversity back to the user in a way that the user can better understand the options and then help themselves.

Google is fanatically loved, but as much because the first round of Internet Search companies forsook search. And of the next round, Google executed better than anybody else. Particularly in staying focused on search and in endearing themselves to their users. Hat's off on that. That doesn't mean that they have solved the problem of finding what you are looking for in all cases. There are yet miles to go ...

Posted on July 25, 2003 11:40 PM |
Categories: Search

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.ramanarao.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/8

Comments

What do you think is missing from an engine like kartoo? (other than speed) That seems to have a good system for starting with a single word and then dynamically generating easy clickable interfaces for eliminating homonyms as needed. Kartoo would seem to logically have everything missing from Google, though I personally for some reason still use google.